Confirm your password*
First name*

Producer Supplier
Representative Other
Privacy options

By clicking here, I agree that ENP Publishing may collect and use my personal data which I have provided in this form, for serving me the requested services and the marketing material that I have agreed to receive, in accordance with their data protection policy. If I do not accept these terms, I understand that access to my services might be restricted.

Zone of interest
France / North Africa Spain / Portugal
Latin America Turkey
Middle East Other
* Required fields

Asia Pulp & Paper (APP) further refutes allegations and announces it will invite stakeholders to review the facts in relation to the allegations made

<< Back to Breaking News

Asia Pulp & Paper (APP) further refutes the allegations made by the Associated Press (AP) stories of 19 and 20 December, and announces it will be inviting its stakeholders to review the facts in relation to the allegations made.

Firstly, as in previous statements, APP has made clear that allegations that various ownership structures have been deliberately used for the purposes of systematically avoiding sustainability commitments have been made without proof. All APP suppliers are held to the same high standards, regardless of ownership. The allegations made with regard to ownership and the integrity of the supply chain are also not new, and these are allegations that have addressed by APP in the past.

Secondly AP insinuated that APP, through Bangun Rimba Sejahtera, is “pressing ahead” to turn 66,000 Ha of state land in Bangka into industrial forest plantation and that it “plans” to breach its commitment to obtain Free, Prior and Informed Consent from local communities. These are all conjecture. While it is true that APP has carried out an evaluation of the supplier, BRS has yet to commence land preparation or tree planting. All potential suppliers must attain FPIC before developing new concessions, a process which has not commenced for BRS. All suppliers must also undertake assessments under the FCP, to identify and preserve areas of High Carbon Stock and High Conservation Value, as well as other areas of significance for the community. Based on our preliminary assessment, if the concession is to be developed, only a third of the land, or about 22,000 Ha, is suitable for development into a forest plantation. Nearly 44,000 Ha of forest in the concession area would either be largely preserved or reserved for community use should APP take BRS as a supplier. The 66,000 Ha number has been used to sensationalize the story.

Thirdly, the AP report refers to the 2015 fires but ignores the progress made since to combat fire and haze. It also insinuates that APP plantations and supplier concessions are the primary cause of fires and haze. Global Forest Watch released data at the height of the 2015 fires and identified 56% of fire alerts as originating from “areas outside concessions” and only 16% coming from pulpwood plantations. The AP article also suggests that one of the suppliers of APP, Bumi Mekar Hijau (BMH), was found guilty of land burning thus breaching APP’s no burn policy. As clarified by BMH, this is false. BMH stated that it was not found guilty of deliberately burning concession land but was fined because there is a strict liability in Indonesian law for forestry that makes concession owners solely responsible for any sizeable fire inside their concession areas regardless of how it started. As such, none of the parties appealed the High Court decision. Allsanctions relating to affected suppliers or concessions were lifted after 2016 post on ground verification by the Indonesian Ministry of Environment and Forestry. This allowed APP to resume its relationship with them.

What is more telling is that the AP report has failed to reflect the serious progress that has been made in fire and haze prevention in both companies like APP and in Indonesia. APP and its suppliers have invested over US$100 million to combat fire and haze in the last two and half years and the extent of fire affected areas has continued to fall. In 2017 the total area affected by fire in APP supplier concession areas amounted to about 0.01% of the total supplier concession area. To suggest that APP suppliers are continuing to burn land or that APP only pays lip service to combating fires and haze makes no sense. The success of the Indonesian effort to combat forest fire is also backed by statistics. Global Forest Watch reported that the number of fires across Indonesia dropped from 180,133 in 2015 to 17,999 this year, a not insignificant achievement.

APP is willing to engage its stakeholders to address the concerns that have been raised. It is prepared to review the issues with them and to reassure them of our unwavering commitment to our sustainability journey. Furthermore, APP is open to dialogue with AP and is open to receive documents and relevant information that have been made available to AP, in order to investigate specific allegations made.

Copyright © 2013 PaperFirst by groupenp.com. All rights reserved. Markets covered: France – Belgium – Switzerland - Spain – Portugal – Turkey - North Africa – Middle East – Latin America – And beyond…

Content Disclaimer - Legal - Data protection charter - Cookies - developed by Atmedia Communication